|
March 8, 2012 - No. 31
International Women's Day 2012
Women Workers Must Lead the Struggle for
Renewal
International
Women's
Day
2012
• Women Workers Must Lead the Struggle for
Renewal
Wheat Board Allies Vow
to Continue Fight Against Harper Dictatorship
• Let the Farmers Decide! - Dougal
MacDonald
Ministerial Power in
Service of Narrow Political Interests
• Government Cuts Funding for Palestine House
Ten Years After the
Failed Coup in Venezuela
• Defending the Strides to Open Society's
Social Progress
International Women's Day 2012
Women Workers Must Lead the Struggle for Renewal
The Communist Party of
Canada (Marxist-Leninist) greets March 8,
International Women's Day, with full confidence that women workers will
continue to take the lead in the work to open society's path to
progress. The more the all-sided crisis in which society is mired
deepens, along with it the discrimination
to which women are subjected as workers, as women and as mothers also
worsens. This is why it becomes ever more significant to support the
women who take their place in the front ranks of the struggles which
are taking place for the recognition of the rights of all. This is
especially true when it comes to the
need to renew the political process so that the people's striving for
empowerment can become a reality. Today, as always, the question of
gender discrimination is a question of emancipating the working class
and the mobilization of women workers for the renewal of the political
process is a step in this direction.
As is the case with all the workers, to be political, the women workers
must work out their program and take the same to all sections of the
society.
By raising their own demands
within the struggle for the
emancipation of the entire working class, women workers will make great
headway to achieve their own emancipation as well.
CPC(M-L) calls on advanced women workers to join the
Party, organize
basic organizations for the emancipation of women at their workplaces,
inclusive of all fellow workers irrespective of gender, and excel in
taking up political affairs under the banner of the democratic renewal
of the political process.
CPC(M-L) takes this opportunity to express its full
support for all
women fighting for emancipation on the world scale and to hail the
increasing participation of women in political affairs. The Party
condemns all acts of oppression and humiliation of women, condemns the
rape and other forms of brutality and
terror practiced by the ruling circles against them and demands that
all those committing crimes against women be punished.
Hail March 8 -- International Women's
Day!
All Out to Support the Fight of Women for Their Rights and the Rights
of All!

Wheat Board Allies Vow to Continue Fight
Against Harper Dictatorship
Let the Farmers Decide!
- Dougal MacDonald -

In a ruling on February 24, Justice Shane Perlmutter of
the Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba dismissed an application for an
injunction
against the Harper
dictatorship's Bill C-18, the so-called Marketing Freedom for
Grain Farmers Act which will end the Canadian Wheat Board's (CWB)
single desk August 1. The application was brought by eight former CWB
directors fired from the board when the Harper dictatorship
proclaimed the new legislation late last year. Justice Perlmutter
is a Conservative Party donor who was appointed by the
Harper dictatorship on February 4, 2011. In throwing out the case,
Perlmutter rejected the plaintiffs' argument that a clause in the old CWB
Act bound the federal government to hold a vote by grain producers
before
ending the Wheat Board's
public marketing monopoly. He also rejected the argument that farmers
would suffer irreparable harm if prairie grain marketing was opened up
to private grain monopolies such as Cargill, Viterra and Richardson.
Perlmutter pointed out that as a Justice of the Court of
Queen's Bench of Manitoba any injunction he granted would only apply to
Manitoba grain producers. "As such, staying the operation of the New
Act would have the
undesirable effect of creating disparities between provinces," he
wrote.
In December 2011, Federal Court Justice Douglas Campbell
ruled that Harper's Minister of Agriculture Gerry Ritz broke the law
when he introduced his CWB marketing bill without first holding a
plebiscite amongst the farmers, as required by section 47.1 of the old CWB
Act.
But Campbell was not asked to rule
on the validity of Bill C-18 itself, and it passed following his
decision. Perlmutter said he was "not bound" by Campbell's
decision, which was at odds with his own interpretation of Section 47.1
-- that the federal government was not required to hold a
vote before ending the Wheat Board's public monopoly. The Harper
dictatorship is appealing
Campbell's ruling and arguments are likely to begin in May.
The farmers and their organizations leading the fight
against the arbitrary dismantling of the
CWB say Perlmutter's decision is just one incident and that the battle
over the future of Prairie grain marketing is not over. The Friends of
the CWB, the CWB Alliance and others will continue to
support a
Constitutional challenge to Harper's dismantling of the Wheat Board.
Bill Gehl, chairperson of the CWB Alliance stated, "This is a question
of
due process and the rule of law itself. Federal
Justice Campbell has already ruled that Ottawa's actions are 'an
affront to the rule of law' and we believe everyone, including the
Minister of Agriculture must follow the law. The ruling of a provincial
judge is certainly not the last word on this issue," Gehl said. "We
firmly believe Ottawa broke the law when it
introduced its legislation ending the Wheat Board and dismissing our
farmer-elected directors. Our court action speaks to our basic
constitutional rights to vote on the control and mandate of our Wheat
Board."
Former CWB chairman Allen Oberg, one of the eight former
farmer-elected directors, found Perlmutter's
decision "extremely disappointing." "He's suggesting that if you just
remove one grain from the wheat board's jurisdiction
that a [farmer] vote is required. But if all grains are removed a vote
is not required. That doesn't make any sense at all," Oberg said. He
and the other former directors may appeal the ruling, he added.
"This is
another one of those legal skirmishes but it only makes up a small part
of the battle," said Saskatchewan farmer Stewart
Wells, also a farmer-elected board director fired under the new
federal law. "We're ready for a long fight," said another former CWB
director Kyle Korneychuk
in response to the judgment. Korneychuk said the former directors have
not yet decided if they will appeal Perlmutter's ruling.
Korneychuk also said they have "been hearing that lots of other farmers
aren't too happy" with
Harper's actions in dismantling the CWB. Users of short-line railways
and producer cars worry these could
be in jeopardy, he added. The entire matter has gone past being
only a grain-marketing issue and become "an issue of democracy," he
said. He challenged the federal government to end the legal
skirmishing by letting producers vote on the change, as required
by the old CWB legislation: "If we're in the minority, have a simple
vote."
Other Outstanding Lawsuits

Rally in front of
the Wheat Board's Winnipeg head office, October 28, 2011. (Friends of CWB)
|
Also looming are two class-action suits against the
Harper dictatorship over its removal of the Wheat Board's public
monopoly, both seeking billions of dollars in compensation for Prairie
farmers. One lawsuit, launched February 15, claims the new legislation
violated
farmers' Charter rights and
seeks to restore farmers' democratic
control of the Wheat Board and the right of producers to collectively
market their grain. Said Stewart Wells, "We have a
broadly based group supporting this action
including eight of the ten deposed farmer-elected CWB Directors, the
Producer Car Shippers of Canada, the Canadian Wheat Board Alliance,
various civil society groups, the National Farmers' Union and others
who are affected by the changes Ottawa has imposed on farmers." (To
join
the class action, visit: www.cwbclassaction.ca.)
The other class action lawsuit was filed in Saskatoon on
January 9 by Regina-based lawyer Tony Merchant. Duane Filson, a farmer
from Woodrow, Saskatchewan, is named as plaintiff. The Canada-wide suit
claims that western Canadian farmers must be repaid $15.4 billion by
the federal government as a result
of the dismantling of the CWB. Merchant said the $15.4 billion
represents the value of the Wheat Board's tangible assets, including
$100 million in cash, about $102 million for 3,400 hopper cars, $65
million for two lake freighters and $14 million for the head office in
Winnipeg, as well as intangible assets, including
premiums paid to wheat and barley farmers over 20 years ($7.4 billion)
and transportation and logistics savings of $7.7 billion over the same
period.
In related news, the effects of the loss of the Wheat
Board's single desk and aim of serving farmers are already being felt.
On March 1, the CWB reached an agreement with private grain monopoly
Cargill to move the board's 2012/13 grains through Cargill's grain
elevators and port facilities, the first such deal after Harper's
destruction of the public monopoly.

Ministerial Power in Service of Narrow
Political Interests
Government Cuts Funding for Palestine House
On February 14 Palestine
House Cultural and Educational
Centre, in Mississauga, Ontario, or Palestine House as it is known,
revealed that Jason Kenney, Minister of Citizenship, Immigration, and
Multiculturalism, on behalf of the Harper government, had decided not
to renew its funding for the services it provides to the surrounding
community. The nearly $1 million in annual government funding
went towards immigrant settlement services, daycare and English
language training for some 1,100 new immigrants in the area. Besides
the loss of these important services, 20 employees will lose their jobs.
The decision to cut its funding is openly aimed at
punishing
Palestine House for the work carried out by its cultural centre which
upholds basic principles of human rights and international relations
through its defence of the Palestinian people's rights and opposition
to their oppression by the state of Israel. Such just stands are
supported
by the vast majority of peace- and justice-loving people around the
world.
It is no coincidence the decision by the Harper
government followed a Canadian government delegation's trip to Israel
on February 5 where Foreign Minister John Baird crowed like a little
schoolboy that Canada is "Israel's staunchest ally" and "greatest
friend," declaring to the world the Harper government's support
for Israel's war crimes against the Palestinians and its attacks on
those who support them.
The political nature of the Harper government's cuts are
clear. In December, Palestine House received a letter from Minister
Kenney accusing it of having "a history of taking positions that could
be interpreted as extreme or supportive of terrorists and terrorism."
In it he cited three instances that he said "could
arguably be seen as extreme":
1. Kenney labelled "a map" on Palestine House's
website "showing a Palestinian state encompassing all of Israel" --
it is actually the Palestine House logo which incorporates an outline
of
ancestral Palestine;
2. Palestine House in March 2010 hosted
journalist Abdul Bari Atwan, whom Kenney claims made a statement in
2007 that he would celebrate if Iranian missiles hit Israel;
3) Palestine House held an event October 8, 2011
celebrating the release by Israel of about 1,000 political prisoners in
exchange for Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit. According to Kenney's letter
those
freed included "convicted terrorists and at least one individual who
murdered two Canadian citizens."
The Harper cabal would have
us conclude that dangerous
extremists are in out midst, but the Harper government can be entrusted
to defend us as a
champion of "freedom," "democracy" and "rights." In the name of
opposing extremism or "hateful ideologies," the
Harper government carries out the
most extreme actions such as attacking Afghanistan, invading Libya,
supporting Israeli war crimes, supporting torture, revoking Canadians'
citizenship, using police to violently attack demonstrators -- the list
goes
on.
TML calls on all Canadians to stand with
Palestine House in opposing the Harper government's cuts and to oppose
them for what they are: an attack on the right to conscience of all
Canadians.
Palestine House is calling on all Canadians to make
their views known to Minister Kenney directly (jason.kenney@parl.gc.ca;
CC: Minister@cic.gc.c) and through their local
MPs.
To contact Palestine House:
905-270-3622 ext 221
www.palestinehouse.com

Ten Years After the Failed Coup in
Venezuela
Defending the Strides to Open
Society's Path to Social Progress
It has been nearly 10 years since the April 11, 2002
coup in Venezuela. Its roots lay in U.S. imperialism's dirty wars in
Latin America that left a trail of political repression and
impoverishment to destroy the peoples' sovereignty and make them
servile to foreign, mainly U.S., interests.
However, the coup in Venezuela lasted only two days as the
Venezuelan people and most of the Venezuelan armed forces defended the
newly adopted Constitution and brought President Hugo Chavez back to
the presidential palace.
On February 23, the School of Political Studies at the
University of Ottawa, the Embassy of the Bolivarian Republic of
Venezuela and Territorio Libre, organized a public meeting at the
university to mark the 10th anniversary of the coup. The guest speakers
were Ana Carolina Rodriguez, the Venezuelan Embassy's
Chargé d'Affaires; Francia Malvar, Martha Pardo and Merly
Vanegas, the Venezuelan Consuls General in Montréal, Toronto and
Vancouver respectively. Cuba's Ambassador to Canada Teresita Vicente
Sotolongo, as well as the minister counsellor, Mrs. María de la
Luz B'Hamel, also attended the meeting.

Every year, the
Venezuelan people commemorate their staunch defence of their
Constitution and defeat of the April 2002 coup. Shown here, President
Chavez addressing the nation in April 2009; banner reads "Remember
April."
|
Chargé d'Affaires Rodriguez pointed out how the
2002 coup d'état was aimed at stifling the major transformations
Venezuela has been undergoing since the 1998 election of Hugo Chavez as
president. While the people overcame this coup, Venezuela remains the
target of hostile international powers, she noted.
She explained that in the early years of the Chavez government, a
number of constitutional reforms, including a constitutional assembly
were overwhelmingly ratified at up to 98 per cent through four
electoral processes. In 2000, Chavez was re-elected under the new
Constitution. Mrs. Rodriguez outlined some of
the major changes that have taken place since then: the political
system has gone from a representative democracy to a participatory
democracy; measures have been taken to transform 50 per cent of
uncultivated land into farm land; fishing zone limits have been
extended and laws passed to protect the environment.
As well, the economy is being reorganized so that state revenues are
increasingly and used to meet the people's basic needs. For example,
the
revenue from the petroleum industry -- Venezuela is one of the most
oil-rich nations in the world -- is being used to ensure the people's
food needs are met. However, such changes
aggravate those private interests who benefited from the old
arrangements, she added.
Consul General Vanegas elaborated this point, explaining
that the coup was orchestrated by a small minority comprised mainly of
elements from the oil industry, a small section of the military and the
Catholic Church. She herself was Director of the Office of the
President of the National Assembly on April 11 when
the coup took place. Within hours of the "take-over," she said, the
people were brutally repressed. But the powers behind the coup
underestimated the Venezuelan people's support for the legitimate
government and their willingness to defend the new Constitution, said
Mrs. Vanegas.
Consul General Pardo said that amongst the Bolivarian
Revolution's achievements is the heightened humanitarian and social
consciousness in Venezuelan society -- that the people should receive
what belongs to them by right. She spoke of the strides made in
education, health care and housing. A recent census
shows that Venezuela is made up of a relatively small and very young
population of 28 million people, 10 million of whom are studying at
various educational levels. Thousands of schools have been created,
including the Bolivarian University. Illiteracy has been wiped out. It
is no longer necessary to travel long
distances to get to a hospital since Emergency Care Centres have been
set up throughout the country. Food security is being guaranteed.
Poverty has been reduced by 40 per cent while social investments in
housing and health has increased by 500 per cent. Pensions for all have
been established at one of the highest
levels in Latin America. Economic dependence on the U.S. is being
reduced by expanding trade with countries such as Iran, Russia and
China, and by consolidating regional organizations such as the
Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our Americas (ALBA).
Consul General Malvar reiterated that the powers behind
the coup d'état in 2002 are still active and that further
attempts are still in the making under the influence of international
imperialist interests. She elaborated on the ways Venezuela is opposing
U.S. hegemony and breaking the bonds of neoliberalism. She
spoke of ALBA and how it facilitates international relations that
provide not only trade but health care and social programs. She gave
the example of the Misión Milagro project which Venezuela
carried out in
collaboration with Cuba to restore the sight of two million of its
citizens. She also cited Venezuelan assistance to
Haiti in the form of health care and fuel. She concluded by giving the
example of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC)
as another positive development for the region, noting that its
orientation as a body opposed to foreign interference allows it to take
united stands on issues such as
the Malvinas (Falkland Islands) and the blockade against Cuba.

Read The Marxist-Leninist
Daily
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|