July 20, 2009 - No. 141
Vale Inco Workers' Just Strike
Raises Important Issues
Sudbury, July 17, 2009
Rally
Remove Tony Clement from Government
Friday, July
24 -- 1:00-3:00 pm
McClelland Arena, 1 Garrow Rd., Copper Cliff, ON
Join striking Vale Inco steelworkers, USW Local 6500, at the rally then
march to the picket line! Hosted by CAW/Mine MIll 598 leadership and
Political Action Committee.
|
|
• Vale Inco
Workers' Just Strike Raises Important Issues
Honduras
• Coup Regime Rejects Proposed Solution to
Crisis - Eva Golinger, Postcards from the Revolution
• Hondurans Step Up Resistance
• UN Ignores Honduras Coup Leaders
Vale Inco Workers' Just Strike
Raises Important Issues
Who should profit
from Canada's natural resources -- the people or global monopolies?
Who should control the direction of the
economy?
The just strike by Vale Inco workers goes to the heart
of what it means to have a self-reliant sovereign economy that serves
the people.
In Canada, self-reliance and sovereignty begin with control over
natural resources and the direction of the economy. Mother Earth's
bounty combined
with hard work is our greatest strength. The product that arises from
transforming the raw material of our forests and land into use-value is
the
material foundation of Canada's social fabric. This was true for
thousands of years for Aboriginal Nations and today in modern Canada.
The advent
of machines increases the social product per worker but does not change
the fundamental element of Mother Earth's treasure transformed into
use-value by hard work and the necessity for ownership and control to
be in the hands of the people.
The problem that has arisen is the intrusion of a human
force that does not work directly in production yet controls and
profits from
it. This antagonistic force has no stake in the resource rich regions
other than to take their raw materials using the work of locals. This
hostile force
is the global monopoly personified by distant rich investors -- distant
in both space and outlook. From their far-away places, they imagine and
demand
a return on their stake that must be met regardless of the social and
natural consequences. These owners of monopoly capital base their claim
to
natural resources and right to control and manipulate the economy and
workers' lives on private ownership of Canada's land, resources and
socialized
means of production. These owners of equity and debt see all other
claims on the added-value workers produce, as a cost to them and
reduction
of their return. The main claimant they refer to as a cost is the
resident human factor that transforms the natural resource into value,
the Canadian
working class. The secondary claimant they abhor and denounce as a cost
to them, but utilize as the main instrument to maintain their
dictatorship,
is the society represented by the Canadian state and particularly its
spending on social programs and other needs of the people.
Vale (Inco) chief executive officer Roger Agnelli most
clearly expresses this complaint of the rich and their global
monopolies. Agnelli
contends that the "Sudbury [mining and refining] operations are
unsustainable at current cost levels." According to this monopoly
capitalist from
Rio de Janeiro, Canadian workers who produce the value his global
monopoly and other investors covet must make concessions to lower their
wages,
benefits and pensions, their "cost" as he so ungraciously calls
workers' claims on the wealth they produce, so that owners of capital
can increase their
profits. If workers are unwilling to transfer their claims for
added-value through concessions to the owners of capital both equity
and debt, then in
the words of Vale Inco vice-president Steve Ball, "There will be little
to talk about."
That is the privilege and arrogance of monopoly right,
which Vale Inco workers are bravely resisting.
The "costs" Agnelli refers to as "unsustainable" are the
claims of miners and refiners on the social product they produce
through their
hard work to transform raw material into useable nickel and other
social product. The only legitimate claims on the value added by
workers,
according to Agnelli and others of his social class are those held by
owners of equity and debt. From the capitalist point of view, all other
claims
on added-value are "costs" even those claimants who are the producers
of the wealth in the first place, in this case Vale Inco workers. That
is the
hubris of monopoly right. A handful of global monopolies now control
the world's nickel resource and imagine they can manipulate prices,
supply
and where and when nickel shall be mined and refined. It is the
egocentrism of monopoly power, privilege and wealth that workers and
their allies
must consciously oppose and defeat with unity and determination.
Expanding the Vale Empire on the Backs of the
International Working Class
Financial reports show that profit of enterprise taken
out of Vale's Ontario Inco operations has been approximately $4.2
billion over
the past two and a half years. Interest (and fee) profit for owners of
Vale debt was US$1.765 billion for 2008 alone. Much of this interest
profit
derives from Vale's current US$18.245 billion long-term debt from the
highly-leveraged purchase of Inco in 2007. Other Vale debt held by the
international financial oligarchy has pushed its gross current and
long-term debt and other payments due to US$37.375 billion. This debt
has
relentlessly grown despite high nickel and other basic commodity prices
well into 2008. High market prices for what Vale workers produce
resulted
in a cash increase of around $10 billion during 2008. Instead of
reinvesting this cash in operations such as Vale Inco, increasing the
wages, benefits
and pensions of its most poorly paid workers around the world including
Brazil or paying down debt, the monopoly persists in its policy of
acquisitions. News media reported July 16 that Vale is poised to
acquire fertiliser monopoly Mosaic Co. for $25 billion. Mosaic is 64
per cent owned
by U.S. food monopoly Cargill Inc.
A significant aspect of Vale's debt ownership is that
its claim on realized added-value does not directly fluctuate according
to market
prices for what Vale workers produce or how much added-value is
realized (sold). The return on debt ownership is tied to interest and
fees and must
be paid on pain of bankruptcy according to capitalist commercial law.
Also draining Vale added-value in 2008 was a more than
one billion dollar loss on the derivatives, currency and price hedging
trading
markets. Agnelli does not like to speak about his monopoly's attempts
for big scores in the financial sector that instead ended up draining
millions
from the company's coffers, squandering wealth originally seized from
Vale workers and their countries all over the world.
The Control and Claims of Owners of Monopoly Capital
Are
Unsustainable Mr. Agnelli!
Agnelli's class bias prevents him from correctly
identifying those factors that are "unsustainable" within the
socialized economy: the
claims on realized added-value by the owners of Vale debt, which
lessens the claims for profit of enterprise during "all business
cycles"; the losses
from the company's financial adventures; the instability of markets and
their prices despite the monopoly's best efforts to control them by
controlling
and blocking global production; and the constant pressure from owners
of equity for greater dividends and a higher stock market price.
Agnelli looks to Canadian workers and others around the
world as a source from where he can take added-value for transfer to
the
rich. Another way is greater monopoly control of market prices through
among other actions seizing resource rich regions and blocking others
from
producing there, which is what he is threatening to do with the Sudbury
nickel belt under the hoax that it is "not sustainable." It is notable
that during
the current economic crisis, the worst since the 1930s, nickel and
other commodity market prices have not fallen to historical lows
because of greater
monopoly control of supply and trading of basic commodities.
Ironically and unknown to Agnelli's consciousness, the
power of monopoly right to control prices and supply also drives down
workers'
claims on the added-value they produce and deprives the masses of
people around the world of the means to purchase social product, which
then
becomes a catalyst for even more severe economic crises sending many
monopolies into bankruptcy and ruin. Anti-consciously, the empire
building
of monopolies is the architect of their own spontaneous ruin while the
conscious resistance of the organized working class is the force that
can save
humanity.
When prices rise, as they surely will because of
monopoly manipulation, Agnelli does not want Canadian workers'
production bonuses
and other claims to reduce his bonanza. This is what Agnelli means in
his final offer to Canadian workers published July 7, which calls for a
"restructuring to make each operation, including Sudbury and Port
Colborne, cash-flow positive (after all costs) and self-sustaining in
all business
cycles." According to Agnelli, workers' claims must be low enough under
all circumstances, whether boom or bust, to "sustain" the bloated
claims
of owners of debt and equity, cover any losses Vale may suffer in its
pursuit of big scores in the financial sector and allow Vale to expand
its empire
through acquisitions.
Canadians must understand that the roughly $20 billion
Vale paid to take over Inco's operations in 2007 was sucked into an
economic
black hole never to appear in Sudbury, Port Colborne or Labrador. It
was not a reward for the hard work of the construction workers, miners
and
refiners who built Inco over the last more than one hundred years that
could be reinvested in the region; it was a scam by fraudsters to sell
the rights
to Canada's natural resources and means of production -- rights to land
and raw material that should never be in private hands, for that is an
attack
on the very being of Canadians and their future prosperity and
well-being, which includes the hereditary rights of Aboriginal Nations.
The $20 billion sucked into an economic black hole
created another monster, which is the annual $1.5 billion interest
claim until the
debt is extinguished. That $1.5 billion interest claim must come in
part from added-value produced by Vale Inco miners and refiners. That
claim
by owners of debt and the additional claim by owners of equity that is
taken out of Sudbury and the country are very unsustainable and a high
cost
to Canadians and their socialized economy.
Agnelli attacks the legitimate claim of workers on the
social product they produce because he cannot easily dismiss those of
the owners
of debt unless he puts Vale into bankruptcy protection. Owners of debt
are part of the ruling elite and the international financial oligarchy
within
the imperialist system of states just as Agnelli, Vale and owners of
equity are members of that privileged and obsolete class, which always
owns both
equity and debt. Bankruptcy is a risky last resort that would imperil
the current owners of equity and debt and the existence of the Vale
Empire itself
but fortunes change quickly in the restless reckless world of monopoly
competition and boundless greed, where ruin is a constant threat.
Conscious Resistance to Monopoly Right and Control
How do Canadians assert
their sovereignty and restrict
the global monopolies from exploiting their natural resources and their
work
in transforming raw material into use-value? How do Canadians put the
country on the path to nation-building free of the destructive clutches
of
the global monopolies? That is a dilemma faced by Canadians and others
around the world that must be taken up for solution. For it is from the
control over resources, means of production and the state, and the
power of the enormous wealth they seize that the monopolies cause havoc
with
prices, leave the resource regions underdeveloped and whole economies
in crisis, squander money in parasitic schemes for big scores in the
financial
sector and use their power and wealth to finance private and state
armies to compete, fight, build and destroy empires and wage wars
against the
people and amongst themselves over control of natural resources,
chattel labour and spheres of influence.
The Vale Inco miners and refiners are on the front lines
to restrict monopoly right through their fight against concessions and
to
maintain for new hires their Canadian-standard wages, benefits and
pensions. Canadians should rally round this just strike and ensure that
it is
won.
This strike focuses attention on the broader issues of
control over the country's natural resources and the direction of the
economy.
Canadians should discuss the question of control over
their work and lives, which means crucially control over the natural
resources
of this land and the direction of the socialized economy and who should
benefit from it. Restricting monopoly right to exploit Canada's natural
resources would be a great advance towards building a human-centred
alternative. Defeating Vale Inco's attack on Canadian workers is part
of
restricting monopoly right.
Let us organize discussions on the necessity for the
people to assert their sovereign right to own, control and profit from
Canada's
natural resources and decide the direction of the socialized economy,
which includes new arrangements with Aboriginal Nations that restore
their
hereditary rights.
The just strike by Vale Inco workers goes to the heart
of what it means to have a self-reliant sovereign economy that serves
the people.
In Canada, self-reliance and sovereignty begin with control over
natural resources and the direction of the economy.
Whose Canada? Our Canada!
Whose economy? Our economy!
Who decides? We decide!
Concessions are not
solutions! Rally round the just strike of Vale Inco
workers!
Honduras
Coup Regime Rejects Proposed Solution to Crisis
- Eva Golinger, Postcards from the
Revolution, July 19, 2009 (excerpts) -
TML is posting below
excerpts from a July 19 update from journalist Eva Golinger plus
related news regarding the mediation between constitutional President
Manuel Zelaya and his delegation and that of the coup leaders and their
president Roberto Micheletti. The talks, which began on July 10, are
being held in Costa Rica with Costa Rican President Oscar Arias serving
as mediator.
***
The talks are finished for now, with no resolution. The
coup regime in Honduras, which ousted President Zelaya exactly 3 weeks
ago, has rejected the
7-point proposal put forth by designated mediator Oscar Arias,
president of Costa Rica. Zelaya's delegation in Costa Rica had earlier
stated they had accepted
the proposal, but later said they accepted debating the proposal, and
didn't comment on whether or not they had unconditionally accepted all
seven terms
laid out by Arias.
The coup regime today introduced a counter-proposal,
which would not have allowed for President Manuel Zelaya's return to
the presidency,
but would have allowed his return to Honduras, to be tried and
imprisoned for alleged constitutional violations. The coup regime and
those participants in
the June 28th coup d'etat that involved the violent kidnapping and
forced exile of President Zelaya, have claimed that a coup did not take
place, but rather
a "rescue" of the constitutional [order]. They claim that President
Zelaya was violating the constitution by proposing a non-binding
national survey on the
possibility of future constitutional reform. Most strange in this claim
is that a non-binding survey, which means it doesn't legally matter
what the outcome
is, to consult the people's will regarding their constitution, is
somehow a violent crime that justifies kidnapping, forced exile, and 3
weeks of imposed national
curfew, suspension of constitutional rights and repression of the
people. Who are the real criminals? [...]
President Zelaya's delegation reaffirmed their
commitment to the mediation process and verified they had accepted the
7-point proposal from
Arias as a point of debate, particularly point 1, the restitution of
Manuel Zelaya to the presidency of Honduras. Even President Oscar Arias
-- the mediator
(via Washington) -- confirmed that point 1 was the essence of the
entire negotiation. The Zelaya delegation declared the talks as
"failed" and "over," but
Arias called for another 72-hours to work on a solution that will
prevent a civil war from erupting in the Central American nation. "Give
me another 72 hours
to work tirelessly on a solution, in order to avoid bloodshed," Noble
Peace prize winner Arias said before the international media that were
anxiously awaiting
the outcome of today's meetings outside the presidential residence in
San José de Costa Rica.
Another 72 hours? Stalling, or a sincere attempt to
prevent civil war? Be it either, too much time has already passed that
has allowed for the
coup regime to violate more than a thousand citizen's human rights,
assassinate and injure dozens others and consolidate itself in the
government.
How will Washington react now? Will Obama-Clinton
continue to skirt the issue of a "coup" and the return of Zelaya to
power and back the
72-hour request by Arias? Probably. And Clinton lawyer and Advisor
Lanny Davis will continue to make roadways in Washington for acceptance
of the
coup regime in Honduras. [...]
***
In related news, ousted Honduran President Manuel
Zelaya says he will return to his country next weekend after peace
talks with the rival
coup government broke down.
"Next weekend we will have all the necessary activities
(in place) for my return," he said on Sunday.
Talking from Nicaragua, where he has been based since
the Honduran army forced him into exile three weeks ago, Zelaya noted
that internal
resistance was being organized in his country for his return.
Earlier on July 5, Zelaya tried to return home, but he
was forced to give up when the Honduran military parked military
vehicles across the
runway he was trying to use.
The deposed leader also urged the international
community to support him as the democratically elected president of the
country.
"I expect the international community to back us in
restoring democratic order," said Zelaya.
For Your Information
News agencies report that Oscar Arias, who was
designated by the U.S. Department of State to assume the role of
mediator in the Honduran crisis is said to have presented a "document"
to both parties, which include representatives from the coup regime and
the
constitutional government that was ousted in the coup on June 28. The
document called on all parties to accept the following seven terms in
order to resolve
the political crisis:
1. Allow President Manuel Zelaya to return to his post
as president until the end of his term on January 29, 2010.
2. Conform a new government (with Zelaya as president)
based on "unity" and "reconciliation," composed on representatives from
all political parties
in the country to govern through the end of Zelaya's term.
3. Declare a general amnesty to those actors involved in
the coup d'etat.
4. President Zelaya will have to renounce any effort to
convene a referendum or consultation with the people of Honduras
regarding future constitutional
reform.
5. Hold early elections during the last weekend of
October instead of November 29th, 2009.
6. The military will be commanded by the Supreme Court
of Honduras as of September 2009 in order to "ensure" a smooth
electoral process.
7. Creation of a truth commission composed of renowned
Hondurans and members from the international community, particularly
the Organization of
American States (OEA) to supervise the correct return of constitutional
order and the implementation of the above terms.
Hondurans Step Up Resistance
People`s unity and their determination to reverse the
military coup have consolidated the Honduran people`s hopes for
achieving a truly fair participative
democracy in Honduras, presidential candidate Cesar Ham told Prensa
Latina.
Ham, who presented himself as candidate for the
Democratic Unified Party (UD in Spanish) added that peoples' resistance
confirmed the
possibility of changing the conditions of misery and exploitation his
country is living. There was the Honduras before the June 28 coup, and
there is another
after it, he said.
Ham pointed out that the constitutional order in the
country was broken last June 28 when masked troops kidnapped President
Manuel Zelaya
and forced him into exile in Costa Rica. When the news was heard
popular leaders and thousands of people gathered in front of the
presidential house
demanding Zelaya's return and condemning coup leaders. Marches and
demonstration have been going on for 23 days, in spite of brutal
repression by the
armed forces, he pointed out. With such facts, we are hopeful that we
will be able to make necessary changes in the exploitive structures
that have plunged
Hondurans into misery, he said.
Ham expressed his rejection and that of the UD to
international manoeuvres aimed at trying to deprive the Honduras people
of the opportunity
to fight the oligarchy and military coup leaders. He also noted that
the UD has clearly expressed its position regarding the U.S.-backed
mediation by Costa
Rican President Oscar Arias. The dialogue process should only seek the
unconditional return of president Manuel Zelaya to the government, he
emphasized.
He added that those who violated the Constitution, human rights and
repressed the population must be punished.
UN Ignores Honduras Coup Leaders
The United Nations Security Council tossed aside a
letter by Honduras coup leaders in which they requested its
intervention after alleged threats and
provocation by Venezuela.
UN diplomats told Prensa Latina that the letter has not
received any attention, and it will not be distributed as an official
document.
That decision was made by Ugandan Ambassador Ruhakana
Rugunda, who received the document Thursday as Security Council
chairman.
"The Security Council only receives correspondence from
governments and organizations that it recognizes", the consulted
diplomatic officials
highlighted.
The letter is signed by Honduras de facto foreign
minister Carlos López Contreras, who accuses Venezuelan
President Hugo Chávez of plotting
to invade the Central American nation.
He also claimed that the jet with Venezuelan
registration in which Honduran constitutional President Manuel Zelaya
tried to return to Honduras
on July 5 had violated Honduras airspace.
The UN Security Council considers the de facto
government in Honduras illegal, after the UN General Assembly passed a
resolution
condemning the June 28 coup.
It has also called upon the UN 192 members not to
recognize any government other than Zelaya`s.
Read The Marxist-Leninist
Daily
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|